This story is a lot more unhinged than the ones we’re used to… Mind Mangler Review
Once again, I find myself reviewing another Mischief show (fun fact: this is the first time I have ever spelled Mischief correctly first time).
This time, we’re talking about Mind
Mangler: Member of the Tragic Circle, a spinoff show featuring two
characters from Magic Goes Wrong. These are the two characters you’ve seen in all the previews, such as Comic Relief, which actually
went wrong!
Unlike my other reviews, this
one will only contain spoilers for the bits unique to the show I saw, not the
plot in general (although it is mostly just a series of tricks, there is an
underlying story happening between the two main characters). This way, you can
watch the show without it being spoiled for you.
The characters included are The Mind
Mangler AKA Keith (Henry Lewis), and his stooge Clive AKA Brian AKA Stephen AKA
Steven AKA Mike AKA Mickey AKA Audience Member AKA Different Audience Member AKA
The Stooge (Jonathan Sayer)
Magical Glossary
Stooge (n.) - someone planted in
the audience who knows how the trick works and will be selected by the magician
"at random" to be part of a magic trick.
As we went in, we were given a small piece of paper and a pencil that said to print your full name and a secret – Mine were:
Name
PHIL BOTHAM
Secret
I have only seen the first 5 minutes of The Wizard of Oz
Phil Botham is not my real name
or the one I wrote on the card; this is my fake blog identity.
It was only after writing this
that I thought a better secret would be that I preferred 2016 Ghostbusters to
1984 Ghostbusters
As it turns out, I’m glad my
secret wasn’t picked either way, as the other secrets revealed were way more
exciting.
I asked a theatre usher if she needed the pencil back, to which she replied that she didn’t know, so I’m now the proud owner of an unbranded IKEA sized pencil:
Pic
WRITE YOUR SECRET ON THE CARD PROVIDED AND PLACE IT
IN THE BALLOT BOX
And
CAN YOU PREDICT THE FOUR DIGIT CODE AND OPEN THE SAFE?
Occasionally, Lewis’ voice would
say “This is the Mind Mangler. During the show, I will be trying to become a
human lie detector. Please write a secret on a piece of paper and put it in the
boxes provided.”
There was a safe onstage before
the show, but it was largely ignored until close to the start time, when
audience members started queueing up to try to guess the code.
It’s possible that the
instructions about the safe were too vague, so it might be worth addressing
this in Lewis’ voiceover. Just a suggestion.
When the show started, the Mind
Mangler (MM from this point on) said that he needed to get into the safe as
that contained the only key to a sealed lockbox hanging above the stage, which
he needed to get into as it contained his car keys, which he needed to drive
the safe back to his hotel Nearby for them to reset it.
He also explained that he had
written a prediction in his sleep that was recorded on a piece of paper which
was also in the lockbox.
It was the use of the Lockbox
which made me wonder who wrote this show. As you may know, Magic Goes Wrong was
written by Henry Shields, Henry Lewis, and Jonathan Sayer of Mischief Comedy in
collaboration with Penn and Teller of Penn and Teller.
However, as Shields is not in this show, I wondered if he was part of the writing process. He is credited as co-author on the Mischief website, but that may just be as creator/developer of characters included.
I’m even less sure if Penn and
Teller were involved this time, as they are not credited at all. The magic
consultant is listed as Ben Hart, another magician who worked on Magic Goes
Wrong.
However, the suspended lockbox is not a trick designed by Hart, Penn, or Teller. As far as I can tell, it was created by magician Piff the Magic Dragon (“You might have heard of my older brother… Steve”), although I have seen similar techniques used by other magicians.
Back to MM, and the show starts
with the act used in promotional spots (including once before the then Prince
of Wales, now King), with MM trying to guess people’s names. As usual:
MM: What’s your name?
Audience Member: Harry.
MM: …Do you have a friend called
John?
A: No
MM: Any Johns in your immediate
family?
A: No
MM: In your distant family?
Think a way back.
A: No
MM: Do you work with a John?
A: I used to.
MM: I knew it…
He then senses what people’s jobs are:
MM: What’s your job?
Audience member: I’m a junior
school teacher
MM: That’s why I wrote that you
work (takes card out of pocket)… INDOORS.
MM: What’s your job?
2nd Audience member:
I work indoors.
It was at this stage that the show was slightly derailed. MM has cards secreted around his person saying various things, which he has to tenuously connect each job to. In this case, he gleaned that the audience member worked in IT support (“Have you tried turning it off and on again?”), and dragged out that he had once done work at a court house “That’s why I wrote that you are (takes card out of pocket)… A JUDGE.”
MM selected someone from the front row to “Think of an object and write it on this piece of paper then seal it in this envelope” [loud ticking noise starts playing] “Anything you like” [prominently indicates his watch] “Take your time… Watch that you write it down carefully.”
He then asked if the audience
member was thinking of a watch [large banner saying ‘WATCH’ falls from the top
of the stage]. The audience member replied in the negative. MM continued to
guess random objects throughout the show.
MM produced a homemade mind
reading device, which looked like an adapted metal detector. He put it over
some audience members’ heads with a camera following him and read their
thoughts, including the following:
Man’s thoughts: I think my
wife is in love with her French teacher.
Woman next to him’s thoughts: Yes,
I am.
Man behind them’s thoughts: Bonjour!
The phrase used instead of ‘in
love with’ has no place on this family friendly blog, which reminds me, this
was the evening performance so featured more choice language than usual.
Parents of young children be aware to book tickets for matinee performances.
MM then (WARNING: I may be
getting the order of these sections in completely the wrong order) picked up
one of the bowls of secrets. He then asked someone in the front row to read out
the name ONLY.
TO PROTECT ANONYMITY IN THIS
SECTION (YOU WILL SEE WHY), ALL NAMES HAVE BEEN CHANGED
The first card said Ian, which MM said would be an example as there was only a first name (“You’ve totally misunderstood the point of this!”). Ian’s secret was:
I’m reviewing the show
Cue immediate backpedalling and
a suitable amount of grovelling.
I’m not sure if that ‘secret’
was a plant though, as it was a good joke to include.
The second secret was from Sophy
Hutton (I can’t think of a good pseudonym, so Denise*, I’ve given you the name
of a fictional character).
Sophy was given a microphone, and a camera was pointed at her. MM slowly teased the not family-friendly story out of her:
“So there was an item of clothing involved. I’m going to name some items of clothing; don’t respond, just keep your face still. Jumper, t-shirt, skirt, trousers… OK – socks, hat – hat?”
He then observed that she was holding the microphone on her stomach.
“So I’m sensing it was to do with your stomach, no, don’t respond, maybe your bowel?”
It was at this point that Sophy started to laugh, as MM asked for the rest of the story, which I’m surprised didn’t elicit a Dr Suess reference:
“YOU **** IN A ***?!”
Yes, she did, but she did not like it Sam-I-am.
It should be noted that MM said
that although this is part of the act, this particular secret was more unhinged
than most. Speaking of slightly less unhinged secrets, the next secret was that
of Theodore Laurence, who got off to a bad start:
MM: Who are you here with?
TL: My family.
MM: And do they know about this
secret?
TL: No.
MM: Never a great start…
(In case you were wondering, Sophy’s partner knew about her ‘incident’)
Theodore’s issue was still unhinged, but less so. His secret involved druids at Halloween.
The final secret included didn’t have a name on, so the selector just read out the secret. “Yes, I see why you chose to be anonymous”
He then asked the entire audience to stand up if they were able (I wasn’t, so thank you for thinking of me) and asked each level to say, “That is not my secret.”
“Upper circle, Dress Circle, you may sit down. Stalls, I’ll divide you in two. Just my left? Just my right? Those on my left, sit down.”
MM then went into the stalls, using the handwriting to deduce that the culprit was left handed “Right-handers sit down;” picking on one member “How old are you?” “12”. “If you entrusted a 12-year-old with this, that’s on you. All under 18s sit down.”
MM then went around the audience asking each of them to repeat “That is not my secret,” making some of them sit down and some stay standing, sometimes due to audience ‘ooh’s.’ "I don't think they want you to sit down..."
Eventually the crowd was whittled down to one and I won’t embarrass that person by revealing any more about their secret.
In case anyone’s interested, the
odds of an entire family (mother, father and 3 kids) all being left handed are
approximately 1 in 64 (~1.6%).
Later, MM invited another audience member (‘Brian’ wearing a t shirt saying ‘different audience member’) on to the stage to be hypnotised, accidentally hypnotising himself, which caused Brian to convince him that he should tell an embarrassing secret every time he shook someone’s hand. He also said that every time he heard a bell, he should make a noise like a chicken.
Unfortunately, MM was only capable of producing a sound like a seriously ill chicken, so 'Brian' asked the audience for another suggestion:
“Can you speak a bit louder at the back? Did you say, ‘Pleasing Fungus beetle’? Great idea!”
Yes, Jonathan Sayer picked the hardest animal for Henry Lewis to imitate, causing them both to corpse and break character:
“That is the face of a man who does not know what a Pleasing Fungus beetle sounds like”
I looked them up later to check if the audience member had made them up. They hadn’t.
From this point on, every time a bell dinged, MM yelled
“Look how pleased I am!”
At the end of the first half, MM
indicated a box of 96 5x5x5 Rubik's cubes for audience members to scramble,
then put in a frame during the interval. He then locked himself in a fridge and
knocked himself out.
When the show returned, only 93 cubes were in place, with three randomly placed gaps. MM had a closer look at some of them “And someone’s solved one of them. There’s always one, isn’t there?” He then called three audience members onto the stage to scramble the remaining cubes.
By coincidence it was all three’s birthday that day, which MM asked them:
“Isn’t it?”
“Yes.”
“Yes.”
“Yes.”
As he put the microphone in front of each of their mouths, a recording of him said “Yes.”
Another joke that doesn’t work written down.
Once the three remaining cubes
were put into the frame, MM asked one person to say a word, which was then
revealed to be written on other side of the cubes. That word, while not as bad
as ‘**** in a ***,’ is still not family friendly enough to include here.
Now this trick I know wasn’t created by Penn and Teller because they’ve been fooled by it in the past. They probably know how it was done by now though.
The final trick was the opening
of the suspended box. Having not been able to open the safe, MM didn’t have the
key, but ‘Brian’ had a spare “Because I knew you’d lose yours.”
There was a brief fake out with some random scribbles on the scroll which had some letters hidden in it, but then he unrolled the scroll further, revealing predictions for the show, including ‘IT consultant;’ ‘Teacher that doesn’t do Greek Philosophy;’ ‘**** in a ***’ and ‘Druid scarer.’
He then finally came to the person in the front row, revealed that the object he was thinking of was anti-fungal cream. The scroll was unfurled fully to reveal ‘ANTI-FUNGAL CREAM’
This concludes my unnecessarily
long summary of some of the show-specific bits.
To give my review on the show in general, Mind Mangler: Member of the Tragic Circle is a fantastic spinoff, using some of the best bits of Magic Goes Wrong, but adding its own bits as well. It doesn’t limit itself the mentalism acts as the name might suggest, so it keeps itself fresh.
If it is clear how a certain trick is done (I think I knew or guessed a lot of them**, but I have tried to remove most explanations from this review), there is no need to worry as a trick you won’t understand is probably on the way soon.
Bear in mind especially that if
these tricks can fool some of the most experienced magicians in the world, they
can probably fool you as well.
*Also not her real name. Do you really think I’d be
indiscreet enough to reveal the true identity of someone who did that?
Besides, it’s been so long I’m pretty sure I’ve forgotten Nadia’s*** real name
anyway.
**Once you know how tricks are done, they become a
lot less impressive, so I advise not finding out if you can. Ignorance is
Carlisle.
*** Still a joke. Nadia’s real name is hidden
within the review, but I won’t tell you where.
Comments
Post a Comment
Feel free to answer the questions in the review or suggest a new movie for me to review, but if you want to say something else, please bear in mind this is a family-friendly blog and your comments can be seen by anyone. Offensive comments will be removed.